<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building a team of e-tutors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lindsayjordan.edublogs.org/2008/06/22/building-a-team-of-e-tutors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lindsayjordan.edublogs.org/2008/06/22/building-a-team-of-e-tutors/</link>
	<description>Art &#38; Design. Teaching &#38; Learning.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:20:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://lindsayjordan.edublogs.org/2008/06/22/building-a-team-of-e-tutors/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindsayjordan.edublogs.org/?p=23#comment-88</guid>
		<description>What a wonderful approach to developing an online team of tutors - well done; I think the idea of providing a means of constructive dissent for tutors is brilliant.

I have worked as a remote e-tutor where all communication took place by e-mail; these were often rapid exchanges likening messenger technology.  Some communication took place between tutors by private e-mails and we would bcc selected colleagues in on our private responses to &#039;discussions&#039; (mostly we were over-ruled anyway), but I think that perhaps had the conversations been in a forum it would have been more constructive, especially if there was one maverick feeling they were representing everyone&#039;s views; it would have been easier to put forward a counter-argument. 
 
I agree with you that asynchronous discussion is beneficial for many people who are not so spontaneous in the f2f context - I like to mull over my thoughts and I&#039;ll probably come up with the killer point tomorrow, when it&#039;s too late ...
Your project sounds exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a wonderful approach to developing an online team of tutors &#8211; well done; I think the idea of providing a means of constructive dissent for tutors is brilliant.</p>
<p>I have worked as a remote e-tutor where all communication took place by e-mail; these were often rapid exchanges likening messenger technology.  Some communication took place between tutors by private e-mails and we would bcc selected colleagues in on our private responses to &#8216;discussions&#8217; (mostly we were over-ruled anyway), but I think that perhaps had the conversations been in a forum it would have been more constructive, especially if there was one maverick feeling they were representing everyone&#8217;s views; it would have been easier to put forward a counter-argument. </p>
<p>I agree with you that asynchronous discussion is beneficial for many people who are not so spontaneous in the f2f context &#8211; I like to mull over my thoughts and I&#8217;ll probably come up with the killer point tomorrow, when it&#8217;s too late &#8230;<br />
Your project sounds exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
